Introduction
Transactions involving all or part of 
    a business entity are best 
    viewed as methods for owners and organizations to achieve 
    their strategic objectives. 
    
As examples:
Acquisition, Divestiture, Joint Venture, 
    Strategic Alliance are the more 
    dramatic forms of corporate development. Ideally, they all share the 
    objective of increased shareholder wealth. The strategic goals converge 
    with the wealth generation objectives. Divestiture can help streamline the 
    
    firm’s focus, so that it produces a better return to its redefined core activities. 
    
When the necessary growth and development 
    cannot occur through internal 
    means in a timely fashion, firms turn to "external" methods. It is our role 
    to 
    help lubricate this process, to make it as friction-free as possible. Time 
    and 
    energy spent in transaction and integration problems is simply wealth 
    consumed in non-productive activity. Although transactions are rarely simple, 
    
    reducing the non-productive costs enables more of these projects to achieve 
    
    long-term positive results. 
Careful examination of the feasibility 
    of the transaction, with an eye toward 
    its strategic logic and long-term wealth generating potential, can produce 
    a 
    more realistic go/no-go decision. True complementarity of combined assets, 
    
    including human, intellectual, and cultural assets, is the key to a 
    wealth-enhancing combination. Long-term client satisfaction is paramount 
    in our deliberations as a consultant in these matters. 
    
A Few Purposes of Business Combinations:
 FASB 141 requires all business combinations 
    initiated after June 30, 2001, 
    to be accounted for using the purchase method. 
Under the new rules, an acquired intangible 
    asset should be separately 
    recognized if the benefit of the intangible is obtained through contractual 
    
    or other legal rights, or if the intangible asset can be sold, transferred, 
    
    licensed, rented, or exchanged, regardless of the acquirer’s intent to do 
    so. 
These assets will be amortized over their 
    useful lives (other than the few 
    assets that have an indefinite life), resulting in amortization expense. 
    Remaining useful life analysis promises to be a necessary, ongoing, 
    high-skill activity, now much more in demand than under the old rules. 
There are legitimate concerns over whether 
    the audit staff of many 
    accounting firms can easily or timely adjust to the technical demands of 
    the new FASB valuation requirements. In addition, consider the fact that 
    impairment testing and and valuation fall into the category of preparing 
    financial statements, not auditing them. 
    
 The classic relationship between management 
    of a company and its 
    auditors is: Management prepares financial statements and 
    auditors attest to them. The potential for conflict of interest is clear.
    
    We look forward to working with a company's management and its 
    auditors to assure service quality. We welcome contact from such firms. 
Find more about FASB 141 and 142 here.
© 2008 Value Concepts 
    LLC. All Rights Reserved.
    Philadelphia Office: 8787 Duveen 
    Drive, Wyndmoor, PA 19038
    215-836-0419
    Connecticut Office: 12 Littlefield 
    Drive, Old Lyme, CT 06371
    860-434-2721
    
    
    
